Tag: Association des Veuves du Genocide

  • Simbikangwa, le premier accusé du genocide devant la justice francaise ce lundi le 04/fevrier/2014

     

    Songa

    Songa Samuel Havugimana, un survivant du massacre de Kesho. © AFP

    Autour de la colline de Kesho, où environ 1.400 Tutsi ont été assassinés le 8 avril 1994, des rescapés se souviennent de Pascal Simbikangwa, premier Rwandais jugé en France pour le génocide de 1994, comme d’un homme violent avec les Tutsi bien avant les massacres.

    Pascal Simbikangwa est né et a grandi aux environs de cette colline verdoyante située dans l’ex-préfecture de Gisenyi, dans le nord-ouest du Rwanda, fief du président hutu Juvénal Habyarimana, dont l’assassinat le 6 avril 1994 dans des circonstances non encore éclaircies déclencha le génocide contre les Tutsi.

    M. Simbikanga y possédait une propriété, où il se rendait régulièrement avant le génocide qui a fait environ 800.000 morts. Il a laissé le souvenir d’un homme vouant déjà une haine aux Tutsi et inspirant la peur, bien que, paraplégique, il soit cloué dans un fauteuil roulant depuis 1986.

    “Il avait une ferme près d’ici”, se souvient Samuel Havugimana, agriculteur de 41 ans rescapé du massacre de Kesho. “Les gardiens de vaches (de sa ferme) étaient des Tusti de la région, il (…) passait sa journée à les frapper”.

    Selon Gérard Makuza, responsable local de l’association de rescapés Ibuka, “c’était quelqu’un qui faisait peur (…) Quand il venait dans sa ferme, personne n’osait le regarder. Tout le monde tremblait”.

    Officier de l’armée rwandaise sous le régime hutu, Pascal Simbikangwa est décrit comme tout-puissant et impitoyable dès avant le génocide.

    Ossements

    Jean, 53 ans, dit avoir été interrogé en 1990 à Kigali par Pascal Simbikangwa, alors membre des renseignements militaires. Simbikangwa “m’a donné une gifle (…) Pour me gifler il m’avait fait mettre à genoux parce qu’il était dans un fauteuil roulant (…) A chaque fois qu’il te frappait, tu devais te mettre à genoux ou te coucher”.

    “Il avait la réputation de quelqu’un au-dessus des lois, qui faisait ce qu’il voulait”, a-t-il expliqué à l’AFP.

    Simbikangwa, qui nie l’ensemble des accusations portées contre lui, va être jugé à partir du 4 février devant la cour d’assises de Paris pour complicité de génocide à Kigali et autour de Gisenyi.

    Il est accusé d’avoir fourni armes, instructions et encouragements aux miliciens hutu Interahamwe qui y tenaient les barrages et exécutaient les Tutsi – hommes, femmes et enfants – qui s’y présentaient.

    Mais il ne sera pas jugé pour le massacre du 8 avril 1994 à Kesho, pour lequel il a bénéficié d’un non-lieu. Pour les juges d’instruction français, la “fragilité” et le caractère “tardif” des témoignages “comportant des contradictions” créent un “réel doute” sur sa présence au bas de la colline ce jour-là.

    Makuza et Havugimina, qui ont tous deux affirmé aux juges français l’avoir vu organiser la tuerie, le regrettent.

    “Dans ma famille, nous étions 32. Seuls mon frère et moi avons survécu” au massacre, explique Samuel Havugimana.

    Il voudrait que Pascal Simbikangwa soit remis au Rwanda et y “soit jugé pour ce qu’il a fait sur la colline” sur laquelle, dès la mort d’Habyarimana, plus de 1.500 Tutsi avaient trouvé refuge, comme ils avaient coutume de le faire à chaque épisode de tension ou de violence avec leurs voisins hutu, majoritaires au Rwanda.

    Mémorial

    Le 8 avril, arrivés sur les lieux, des “militaires ont commencé à tirer (…) sur la colline”, a raconté à l’AFP Gérard Makuza, seul rescapé d’une famille de 27 personnes. Au sommet, “il y avait une église. Les femmes, les enfants et les vieux avaient pris l’habitude de s’y réfugier lorsque les villageois nous attaquaient”, se souvient Havugimana.

    “Mais ce jour-là, c’étaient des militaires, des policiers et des Interahamwe” qui attaquaient et aucun de ceux réfugiés dans l’église n’a survécu, poursuit-il. Nombre de ceux qui parviendront à s’enfuir seront massacrés dans la forêt environnante au cours des semaines suivantes.

    A la place de l’église, incendiée ce jour-là, s’élève désormais un mémorial, petit kiosque de béton et de tôle, entouré de plantations de thé.

    Au sous-sol, 12 cercueils recouverts d’un drap violet, couleur du deuil, renferment les ossements des victimes. Sur une étagère s’entassent des centaines de vêtements.

    “Cela aurait été bien que le massacre de Kesho soit aussi dans le dossier”, regrette Naphtal Ahishakiye, secrétaire général de l’association Ibuka, qui salue néanmoins ce premier procès en France, 20 ans après le génocide: “Si l’on commence par lui, cela veut dire que d’autres pourront peut-être suivr.  End

    L’Article de AFP

  • Genocide survivors speak of horrors of the Holocaust, Cambodia and Rwanda

    On Holocaust Memorial Day Freddie Knoller, Sokphal Din and Sophie Masereka describe how they lived through mass killings Sophie Musabe Masereka, a survivor of the Rwandan genocide
    Sophie Musabe Masereka, Photograph: Sean Smith for the Guadian

    After the genocide that took from her a father, two brothers and a niece, which saw her survive malaria, a snakebite and a miraculously misfiring gun; after the genocide that forced her to seek sanctuary in ditches, bushes and a cathedral, Sophie Musabe Masereka made a silent promise.”I said to myself: ‘I will never get married and I will never get kids, because there is no point in being married if my husband is going to be killed; there is no point in having kids when I have seen entire families dying. I would rather stay the way I am’.”

    Twenty years ago this April, Masereka, a Rwandan Tutsi who dreamed of becoming a nurse, watched neighbour turn on neighbour as the country’s Hutu majority embarked on a three-month campaign of systematic slaughter, during which 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were murdered.

    Although tensions and violence between the two groups were common, the shooting down of a plane carrying the Rwandan president, Juvénal Habyarimana, on 6 April 1994 triggered a killing frenzy that was unprecedented in scale and ferocity.

    “Before then, they used to kill quietly; after that it became open,” says Masereka. “I started hearing gunshots, people screaming, homes being burnt. Very early in the morning, I could see many people running in both directions: running, screaming, children crying.”

    Her father, a Seventh Day Adventist pastor who had lived through the Rwandan revolution that preceded the country’s independence from Belgium, called his children together and told them: “All I can say is go find refuge, go find where to hide, but wherever you’ll be, keep praying. If we happen to meet, we’ll pray together.”

    Sophie Musabe Masereka lost her father, two brothers and a niece in the Rwandan genocide but survived herself thanks to a misfiring gun. 

    They were not all to meet again. Five days later, Masereka watched as one of her brothers was taken to the side of the road and shot. After hiding in bushes, where she was bitten by a snake, she decided to return to her family, only to find them being lined up next to one of the newly dug pits that had appeared near Tutsi homes. Her younger brother tried to shoo her away. “He told me: ‘Go! We are going to be killed. We don’t want you to die with us’.”

    His warning saved her life. Ten years ago, she gathered her brother’s bones and those of her father and niece from the pit and washed them.

    The closest of Masereka’s many subsequent escapes came when she was picked up at a roadblock and told she would be shot. For some reason, the bullet that should have hit her fell from the barrel of the gun on to the floor.

    Masereka believes it was God who brought about her escape; the brother who was with her at the time insists her life was spared because he paid the soldiers a bribe of 20p.

    With the help of a neighbour, she managed to get to a cathedral in Kigali where 1,500 people were hiding. The number of sanctuary-seekers gradually diminished as Hutus arrived to take small groups out to be murdered.

    After a while, they tired of the slow pace and told those inside that they would be back the next day with grenades. Once again, her luck held: rebels arrived that night to rescue Masereka and others.

    Two decades on, her memories are as fresh as her grief. “Every day, I find a way to say my people’s names,” she says. “When I’m on the bus sometimes, I remember them and tears come to my eyes.”

    Sokphal Din’s memories, grief and anger are equally vivid. He was 18 when the Khmer Rouge took Phnom Penh, dragged his family out of their house in the Cambodian capital and drove them into the killing fields, where, one by one, he watched them die of hunger, exhaustion and malaria. For four years they lived in the jungle as Pol Pot set about murdering 1.7 million people.

    “It was like living in the dark ages,” says Din. “They called it Year Zero. There was no contact with the outside world. From time to time they forced us to move around like cattle. They kept doing that until we were completely tired and some died from starvation or disease.”

    A tourist walks past portraits of Khmer Rouge victims at the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum, Phnom PenhPictures of victims of the Khmer Rouge at the Tuol Sleng genocide museum in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Photograph: Tang Chhin Sothy/AFP/Getty Images

    With no more sustenance than a daily spoon of rice, he began to find himself obsessed with food – and death. “We closed our eyes every night and dreamed about food; about chicken. But as I was about to eat it, I woke up. Then I’d try to go back to sleep again to continue the dream, and think: ‘Please let me finish that chicken’.”

    His grandmother, whose ashes he still carries, died in his arms in the killing fields. His four-year-old brother was the next to die, succumbing to malaria after trying to fish for shrimp. As he watched his aunt perish and then his cousins, Din felt a monstrous envy.

    “I looked at them and I thought: ‘You are so lucky! You’re dying now. You’re going now, you’re not suffering any more. I am the one who’s still alive here and I don’t know what’s going to happen to me’.”

    He was freed in 1979 after the Vietnamese army invaded Cambodia. After living in a refugee camp and two years as a Buddhist monk, he came to the UK in 1987. Din still dreams, almost every night, of those four years, and of the opportunities denied him by the Khmer Rouge.

    “They took away my future; my dream of becoming something,” he says. “I wanted to be a doctor. They took away my family and all my good memories of my family. They took away my property. I would have been happy if the killing fields hadn’t happened. I would have a lot of children – a family around me – and we’d all be happy.”

    Thirty-two years before Din was forced into a life of exile and hard labour, Freddie Knoller, a Viennese Jew, was put aboard a train bound for Auschwitz.

    “The trains had 10 wagons and 100 people squeezed into each one,” he says. “It was impossible to be comfortable there, but we organised ourselves: we got the old men, the women and the babies and the children who were there to sit or to lean against the wall.”

    Although Knoller and the other young people in the wagon took it in turns to sit and stand, their efforts proved insufficient. By the time the train pulled in to the camp, one child and three of the older people were dead.

    On arrival, he was given a uniform and had the number 157108 tattooed on his left arm. As his head was being shaved, he heard, for the first time, about old people and women being taken to Birkenau to be gassed and cremated.

    “We didn’t believe what they were saying because it was ridiculous. Germany was supposedly a cultured country. We couldn’t believe it, but then they said: ‘You will smell the sweet smell in the air of the burning bodies quite soon.’ And really quite soon we smelled it and we started to believe that what they were saying was really true.”

    A group of children in striped concentration camp uniforms behind barbed wire fencing at AuschwitzChildren at the Auschwitz concentration camp just after it was liberated by the Soviet army on January 27 1945 – the date now commemorated as Holocaust Memorial Day. Photograph: AP

    Despite meagre food and the back-breaking work of carrying 25kg bags of cement to the nearby IG Farben chemical factory, Knoller survived not only Auschwitz but also its death-march evacuation as the Russians approached in January 1945.

    In Bergen-Belsen – where prisoners went without food for a month – he dug the ground in search of roots to eat. Others went to more desperate lengths.

    “The ground was full of dead people and I saw with my own eyes young people finding sharp stones and cutting up the flesh of the dead bodies to roast over fire,” he says. “There was no more discipline.”

    Knoller did not join them in either their cannibalism or their despair. From the moment he was captured by the Gestapo in France in 1943 until the day Bergen-Belsen was liberated by the British in April 1945, he refused to surrender his hope or his faith.

    “I saw in the camps so many prisoners who were pessimists,” he said. “They gave in; they gave up; they didn’t fight for their lives, but I did fight. I believed in God and I still believe in God because I feel if I am in trouble, I can go back and beg God: ‘Get me out of here’.”

    Today, at the age of 92, Knoller makes weekly visits to schools to tell students about the Holocaust. Din and Masereka, who also work with the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust to raise awareness of genocide, want the world to know what happened to them in the hope that others will be spared similar horrors.

    Din is writing a book about his time in the killing fields between shifts on the checkout of a Sainsbury’s in Hampshire and his work as an interpreter.

    “I want people to learn from the past and move on and do right,” says Masereka. “Who are we to destroy somebody’s life?”

    In the end, she found herself unable to keep the promise she made as a 22-year-old: Masereka is married, has three children and works as a nurse.

    End

    Watch the harrowing testimonies of Freddie Knoller, Sophie Masereka and Sokphal Din. Link to video: Forgive or forget: survivors of genocide in the Holocaust, Rwanda and Cambodia describe their experiences

    From the Guardian

    Posted by Albert G

  • Réparation pour les survivants au centre de préocupations d’Ibuka M&J

    Ibuka.beDans un communiqué de presse publié aujourd’hui  par IBUKA mémoire et Justice Asbl à l’occasion du lancement  de la 20ème commémoration du genocide contre les Tutsi, L’assocation appelle le monde pour  se joindre avec elle pendant ce moment de commemoration du genocide contre les Tutsis. IBUKA déclare que la question de réparation pour les survivants, sujet longtemps ignoré par le gouvernement du Rwanda et la communauté internationale,  reste une partie intégrante de la justice. Le communiqué indique que la réparation inclu entre autres garantie de non-répétition, indemnisation et la réadaptation de survivants. Selon le communiqué, la réparation doit être accordé un accent très particulier maintenant que le monde se souvienne du génocide contre les Tutsi 20 ans après.  IBUKA-Mémoire et Justice est une association sans but lucratif fondée en Belgique le 16 août 1994, regroupant les survivants du génocide perpétré contre les Tutsi au Rwanda en 1994, les proches des victimes ainsi que toutes les personnes soucieuses de la mémoire des victimes et du sort des rescapés de ce génocide. Note introductive par Albert G.

    Lisez  l’intégralité de l’article ici Appel à une Vraie Solidarité et au Devoir de Mémoire- Communiqué IBUKA

    Source: www.Igihe.com

  • Netherlands seeks to effect Genocide extraditions in one year

    Deutch prosecutorSupreme Court registrar Olivier Rukundakuvuga (R) shows Teeven (C) and Rugege around the court premises yesterday. The New Times/Courtesy

    The visiting Dutch Minister for Migration, Security and Justice, Fred Teeven, said yesterday his country was ready to extradite or deport some Genocide suspects to Rwanda within one-and-a-half years.

    Teeven made the remarks after meeting with the Chief Justice, Sam Rugege at the end of his three-day visit to Rwanda.

    “I have met with several government officials and visited a number of institutions… We intend to improve our cooperation with Rwanda and I am impressed with what has been achieved in this country in the last 15 years in the field of justice and other sectors,” Teeven said after touring the Supreme Court and High Court premises.

    The Netherlands has been a major partner of the Rwandan judiciary from the times of Gacaca court during reforms within the Judiciary that commenced in 2004.

    Asked if his country intends to extend the cooperation to the level of extraditing cases to Rwanda, Teeven said, “Sure, there are plans to extradite some suspects to Rwanda. We already have a number of cases pending and it is possible that we are going to extradite three or four persons within one and half years from now.”

    He added: “But we are also looking at various possible ways since we have people who illegally entered Netherlands so they will also be deported in a few years.”

    The Dutch courts have so far tried and convicted several Genocide suspects, including Joseph Mpambara, who is serving a life sentence.

    Last year, Yvonne Basebya, 66, was also sentenced to eight years for her role in the Genocide.

    However, the country says it faces a key challenge of fugitives that have already been naturalised as Dutch citizens.

    For a Dutch citizen to be extradited, their citizenship have to revoked first.

    Courthouse construction

    Meanwhile, Chief Justice Sam Rugege said the Dutch government has pledged to finance the construction of a courthouse, which will try Genocide suspects transferred to Rwanda from other jurisdictions.

    “The Dutch have pledged to continue their support to the Judiciary and also construct the courthouse for the High Courts special Chamber trying cases from other jurisdictions. The courthouse, to be located in Nyanza District, will also house the Nyanza High Court,” said Prof. Rugege.

    However, he did not reveal details of when the construction is expected to commence and how much the complex will cost, saying that planning was still at elementary stage.

    So far, cases that have been transferred to Rwanda from other jurisdictions and are being tried by the Special Chamber of the High Court include former Pentecostal priest Jean Uwinkindi and Bernard Munyagishari, the transferees of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR); Leon Mugesera (deported from Canada) and Charles Bandora (from Norway).

    Combating immigration

    In a related development, Rwanda and Netherlands on Monday signed a memorandum of understanding on mutual support in the field of migration and combating illegal migration between the two countries.

    The agreement was signed by the Foreign Affairs minister Louise Mushikiwabo, on behalf of Rwanda, and Teeven on behalf of Netherlands during a closed-door meeting in Kigali.

    “We appreciate the continually growing bilateral relationship between our two countries. Justice is a special sector in Rwanda given our tragic history, we have been seeking a balance between justice and reconciliation,” Mushikiwabo is quoted in a statement from her ministry.

    “The contribution of Dtuch government in rebuilding and reforming Rwandan justice sector has been very much meaningful to Rwandans,” the minister said.

    Minister Teeven said his government “appreciates its cooperation with Rwanda” and was looking to strengthening bilateral ties, particularly in the migration field. “We did a lot together in the justice field and I think we can do more in the migration field.”

    Teeven further said they were considering scaling mutual cooperation in the areas of agriculture and trade.

    Contact email: edwin.musoni[at]newtimes.co.rw

  • The Case Senator Nzirasanaho: A story of violence, intimidation and witness harassment

    senator anastaseThe case against first category genocide suspect Senator Nzirasanaho, is currently about to be closed before the higher instance court of Nyarugenge in Kigali.  This 20 year-old case has been one of the longest and obviously extremely dangerous dossier for several witnesses and survivors involved in the case.   This article explores the direct accounts of witnesses and the ultimate price they had to pay including their lives.

    The case is no doubt a sad story of violence, intimidation and harassmenent . In a separate case, Nzirasanaho is also accused of inciting and distributing arms to hutu population in his native district of Gakenke , Former Ruhengeli Prefecture, to exterminate Tutsis.

    On 5 January 2008, the gacaca jurisdiction of Amahoro cellule in Muhima, Kigali, found Senator Anastase Nzirasanaho guilty of involvement in the genocide and classified him as a category one suspect. For survivors like Xaverine and Jean-Claude, it was a moment of triumph, the fruit of a long and tough battle to hold the senator accountable. In 1994, Nzirasanaho was the director of the para-statal responsible for the coffee industry, OCIRCAFE. Xaverine, who was his neighbour in sector Muhima, Kigali, before and during the genocide, also describes him as “the leader of the interahamwe.” The interahamwe parked their vehicles at his house and reported to him every morning and every evening. I saw all this because I lived very close to his house. I personally saw the senator holding grenades which he gave to the interahamwe after pointing them to Dr Gafaranga’s house. I also heard his wife calling after the interahamwe, saying they had forgotten to take the doctor’s domestic worker who was hiding in their home. The interahamwe took him and killed him together with the doctor.’’ 

    In 1997, Xaverine and two men gave written testimonies to the court detailing allegations against him. One of the two men was, she added, “Nzirasanaho’s bodyguard during the genocide”, and other man, Ezechiel Ntahondi, had also worked for him. Nzirasanaho found out about the accusations.

    ‘’Almost immediately, I started receiving threats. The senator’s wife publicly insulted me,

    saying our actions had not stopped him from becoming a senator. But the intimidation got

    them nowhere. ‘’

    As a result, said Xaverine, Nzirasanaho befriended her husband, Ezechiel Ntahondi’s older brother, in an attempt to persuade Ezechiel to “change his testimony.” She later found out that Ezechiel had been given jobs by Nzirasanaho, and that he had also been persuaded to write a letter to the effect that Xaverine planned to have him killed. In the meantime, her own husband had given a copy of her testimony to the senator. Soon afterwards, Ntahondi was gunned down as he returned home from work at the senator’s house.

    Xaverine became a prime suspect because of the letter written by Ezechiel. While she was being questioned by the prosecutor’s office, she said she could “see the senator’s car driving in circles around the court, trying to keep tabs on the whole process since he had filed the charges against me.” A second summons led to her arrest, but she was released that same evening after interventions on her behalf, “pointing out that the conflict between the senator and I was common knowledge.”

    These people also asked how it was possible that the senator, and not the mother or older brother of the victim, had brought charges against me. But her ordeal was far from over.

     Other people came to insult and taunt me, saying that the senator’s wife gave them money for food and clothes, and asking me what I got from Gafaranga’s widow.  I’m not testifying so I can be paid;

    In fact I’m not even friends with Honourable Steria, the doctor’s widow. But my conscience can not let me hide the truth. Xaverine said she then received visitor, including a survivor and a local official, with offers of money and advice to “stop involving myself in something that could cost me my life.” But she refused to budge. She was, however, shaken when she ran into the senator himself. He stopped his car and said to me: “You refused to make a deal with me, but in two weeks you will regret it.” Afraid, she moved in with her sister.

    But her husband, she said, resorted to beating her to “make me stop pursuing the case.” She reported him to the police and he was detained for a few days. She was then called to the gacaca jurisdiction of cellule Amahoro in sector Muhima, of which the president was the senator’s wife, Christine Mukakarangwa, to give explanations about her written testimony. But they asked me all sorts of bizarre questions so I would lose my composure. The public, seeing the conduct of the judges, refused to return to the court unless a new committee was voted in. So this is what happened; a new committee, presided over by JMV Ngendahimana, was installed, and my testimony was considered.

    The next stage in this extraordinary saga was particularly distressing for Xaverine for it involved her daughter, and ended up with Xaverine in prison. She accuses two women, a member of the previous gacaca and one of the newly elected members, of offering her daughter, who had been raped, enormous material benefits if she would blame her mother and her step-father of sexual abuse so that the young man in prison for the rape could be released. Tempted by the offer, the young girl, who had also been given a job by the  senator and his wife, agreed. However, she was surprised when her testimony was used to release a genocide suspect by the name of Bonaventure Twagiriyaremye instead of the alleged rapist. She was even more upset to hear that her actions had led to her mother’s detention. She came crying to the court house, saying she didn’t know they intended to put her mother in jail. Xaverine was released after her daughter gave a written account of what had taken place to the appropriate officials, but Xaverine’s life has been shattered by the experience. She separated from her husband who, she says, turned her children against her, “telling them I’m a prostitute, that I would not stop testifying because I love to fight with my neighbours and that I’m the cause of all his misery.”

    ‘’I now live alone. My husband lives alone. The children live alone. My husband even

    befriended some of my new neighbours whose attitude towards me has changed. People started throwing stones at my house during the night again.’’

    Xaverine feels she has finally been vindicated. I appreciate the verdict passed by the new gacaca committee of Amahoro cellule in January of this year. By finding the senator guilty of the crimes he was accused of, the judges gave value to our testimonies. She cannot, however, understand why he has been allowed to continue his duties as a senator after gacaca classified him as a first category suspect and who should therefore be tried by the conventional courts. If he remains a free man, I doubt that any witness will survive. Xaverine ran into the senator after his conviction.

    He asked me if I was happy since he had been found guilty, and when I planned on accusing all the others. I just kept on walking. He also came to the area where I stay, apparently to warn the authorities that I might kill him. Luckily, my neighbours know the story and told the same officials that if I died, they should question him. I’m trying to find a way to leave Kigali altogether and move far away from the senator so that I might be safer.

    Leonidas works for the district office of Nyarugenge of which Muhima is a part. Long familiar with the case of the senator, he catalogued the pressures that witnesses have endured and the misfortunes that befell those who insisted on bringing him to justice. Regine Nyirabananira and Ignace Nsabimana, the two main prosecution witnesses, received so many threats that they had to move out of their cellules. Unknown people threw rocks at their houses at night and vowed to kill them if they continued testifying. Vincent Habimana has disappeared mysteriously and Ntahondi was shot by armed men. Eric Uwayisaba also came under fire. The senator had requested Eric to use his influence, as cellule co-ordinator, with the gacaca judges, but he had refused.

    The senator also asked me to fire Regine, without being given a good reason, and I said no. So I too was included on the list of the senator’s enemies. Jean-Marie Vianney Ngendahimana, the president of gacaca, was not spared either. We had people throw stones at our houses in the dark, and I have even seen armed men patrolling my house. Released prisoners come to court to insult witnesses and to implicate some of them falsely in the genocide. I was once asked by a former soldier who is in his camp, Niyibiroye, aka, Cyabingo: “When do you people attend that useless gacaca?” Some witnesses were bribed and later returned to retract their testimonies and defend him instead. He asked a pertinent question.

    ‘’How can Nzirasanaho still be a member of the senate  when he has been found guilty of genocide? From there, he continues to harass people. Two of the first people to accuse him have been killed. Is it any wonder that we fear for our lives?’’

     Nzirasanaho’s wife, he added, also sought to demoralize them.

    ‘’His wife, Mukakarangwa, says publicly that accusing her husband of genocide has

    achieved nothing, and will not change the fact that he is still an important person in the

    Government. And here she’s right. How can he still be a senator? 

    Like Xaverine, Jean-Claude has proved a stubborn witness, and a difficult one because he

    has provided an eyewitness account that strongly implicates the senator in the death of

    Dr. Gafaranga. He was summoned by gacaca when it was presided over by Nzirasanaho’s

    wife. His testimony, he said, “disappeared.”

    The witnesses for the defence seemed to reading out their statements, which made me

    Think that they had been told what to say. He spoke a second time after the new gacaca committee had been established. “From that on”, he said, “I was constantly under threat.”

    I bumped into Nzirasanaho’s former driver and he told me: “If you persist, you will go

    down the same road as Ezechiel.” And Ezechiel had been shot dead.

    Jean-Claude’s life began to unravel.

    ‘’Every evening when I came home, people I didn’t know would hit me, calling me an

    Imbecile for speaking against the senator. I couldn’t sleep at night because of the stones

    that pounded my roof. I finally decided to move, so that I would not die as Ezechiel had

    done. I changed homes twice to make it more difficult for him to find me.’’

    He returned to Muhima after he learned that the president of their cellule gacaca and

    officials in the sector had warned the senator about his actions. Still, he does not feel at

    ease.

    ‘’ As long as he is a senator, he is a menace to our security because he can find ways to

    have us killed without showing his hand directly. What his wife says also makes us

    scared. They have corrupted so many people that we are seen as the enemies of society.

    During his trial, he used prisoners who had confessed their crimes to argue that some of

    the prosecution witnesses were also genocide suspects, including my brother. Even now,

    he continues to meet with these people; I see them coming and going to his house.’’

    Jean-Claude is particularly disturbed by the ties between the senator and an ex-FAR

    soldier, Niyibiroye, known as Cyabingo.

     ‘’During the trial, Cyabingo had a small tape recorder that he used to take to the bars where

    people involved in the trial usually met for beer. This came to light when he got Eric Uwayisaba’s voice on tape; Eric was the cellule co-ordinator. He was asked in gacaca what he was doing with the recorder. He replied that the senator had asked him to use it.‘’

    He does not think that it is feasible for the Government to offer effective protection to Gacaca judges and prosecution witnesses who live in close proximity to the defendants. Nevertheless, when there are significant trials, like the senator’s, security can be improved, for example by placing the accused in preventive detention so that he cannot intimidate witnesses and influence the court.

    Over two decades have now passed since senator Nzirasanaho is enjoying safe heavens in the streets of Kigali at the expense of several victims still under his persistent persecution. The senators’case is now pending in the higher instance court of Nyarugenge. The court is finally due to close the hearing on 20th of January 2014.  

    According to the 2012 Final Report of Gacaca courts, The Case of Nzirasanaho was referred to classic courts alongside other first category genocide suspects.  The report indicates that Boniface Rucagu and General Marcel Gatsinzi were  inter alia classified in the First category genocide suspects whose cases will be heard by classic courts—To date they  are free men occupying high ranked positions in the government

    Ends.

    Posted by Albert. G

  • FRANCE/RWANDA – 2014 WILL BE KEY FOR FRENCH JUSTICE ON THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE

    The year 2014 looks like a key one for French justice, which is set to open its first trial related to the anti-Tutsi genocide of 1994. In the meantime, judicial investigations could be completed in a case referred to France by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and the country’s highest court, the Court of Cassation, is expected to hand down a historic decision on the extradition of two Rwandans suspected of participing in the genocide.

    According to the UN, some 800.000 people, mainly from the Tutsi ethnic group, were killed between April and July 1994 in Rwanda, a small country in central Africa. France, which is accused by Rwanda of being a haven for the genocide perpetrators, is expected to hold a trial from February 4 to March 28, 2014, before the Paris criminal court of Pascal Simbikangwa, a former Rwandan intelligence officer. Simbikangwa, considered close to the family of the late ex-président Juvénal Habyarimana and who is in a wheelchair since an accident in 1980, is due to be tried for complicity in genocide and crimes against humanity.

    France will join a leading group

    Presented as a member of the “Akazu”, the inner circle of Hutu power who allegedly planned and carried out the genocide, Simbikangwa is notably accused of having armed extremist Hutu Interahamwe militia and encouraged them to massacre Tutsis. It was at the end of March that judges Emmanuelle Ducos and David De Pas of the Paris criminal court (Tribunal de grande instance) approved the prosecution’s request to indict Simbikangwa for crimes committed in Kigali and other parts of Rwanda, including the northwestern prefecture of Gisenyi, between April and July 1994.

    “Although we are satisfied to see, nearly 20 years after the genocide, a top Rwandan official tried by the French judicial system, we still regret it has taken so much time for this first trial to take place,” writes Alain Gauthier, president of the Collective of Civil Parties for Rwanda (CPCR) in a communiqué issued Friday. “When we filed a complaint against him, the CPCR did not do it lightly. We have real reasons to want to see him brought to justice. Many witnesses and historians point a finger at him.”
    Simbikangwe, on the other hand, has always protested his  innocence.

    As it opens Simbikangwe’s trial, France will join a leading group of countries such as the Netherlands and Belgium who have already tried Rwandans accused of participating in the genocide before their national courts.

    A Catholic priest accused of rape

    The year 2014 could also see the close of investigations in the widely mediatized case of Father Wenceslas Munyeshyaka. This Catholic priest, who is currently practising in the Gisors parish of northern France, has so far been the subject of three investigations, including by Rwanda, which sentenced him in absentia to life in prison. The priest was also one of the individuals charged by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), which in November 2007 finally transferred his case to France. The French judicial authorities had also opened a case against Munyeshyaka.

    The ICTR indictment accuses the priest, who was in charge of the Sainte-Famille parish in Kigali from 1992 to 1994, of killing and raping several people and delivering dozens of others into the hands of Interahamwe militia who executed them. According to a report by Laetitia Husson of the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (MICT), which is tasked with monitoring his case in France, the judicial investigation could be completed by the end of 2014. The report’s author says she met several times in June with the assistant prosecutor of the Paris court and its vice-president, Emmanuelle Ducos. According to Husson, the vice-president “stressed that the judicial investigation into Munyeshyaka will soon be in its final phase”, while Quintard said it could be completed by the end of 2014. The MICT report says that according to the prosecution, “so long as the case is not dismissed and is referred to the criminal court, the trial should take place in 2015 or 2016”.

    A much awaited decision from the Court of Cassation

    It is also in 2014 that France’s highest court, the Court of Cassation, is expected to decide on an appeal against a decision to extradite individuals to Rwanda. The decision to extradite, delivered on November 13 by the Paris Appeals Court, concerns two men of Rwandan origin, Claude Muhayimana and Innocent Musabyimana. The former is accused by Kigali of participating in the massacre of Tutsis in the western town of Kibuye, while the latter is wanted for killings in the northwestern province of Gisenyi, on the border with the Democratic Republic of Congo.
    This is not the first time that a French Appeals Court has approved an extradition to Rwanda, but it is a first for the Paris Appeals Court. In contrast to its previous decisions, the Court said on November 13 that the persons concerned would not be in danger and would get a fair trial if they were sent to their country of origin. Muhayimana and Musabyimana immediately appealed to the Court of Cassation, which has so far blocked every attempt to extradite people to Rwanda. Its decision on this latest appeal is much awaited. The French judicial authorities are currently investigating some 20 cases linked to the Rwandan genocide, including the widow of the late ex-president Juvénal Habyarimana. In Europe and America, only Canada, the US and Norway have so far sent Rwandans accused of participating in the 1994 genocide back to face justice in their native country.

    ER/ JC

    Posted by Al.G

  • GAERG irasaba ko abajenosideri bidegembya batabwa muri yombi

    GAERG , umwe mu miryango cumi n’itanu (15) igize ‘’Collectif’’ IBUKA  kuri uyu wa gatanu  taliki 13/12/2013 wandikiye ubushijacyaha bukuru usaba guta muri yombi bidatinze ba ruharwa babiri (2) bahamwe n’icyaha cya jenoside yakorewe abatutsi baje mu Rwanda bitabiriye inama y’igihugu y’umushyikirano.

    Mu ibaruwa yashyizweho umukono  na Perezida wuwo muryango Bwana Charles Habonimana,  GAERG ivuga ko uwitwa MURAHONEZA LEWIS mwene Bavakure Pierre na Veronique , uzwi ku izina rya ‘’KIGURUBE’’ yakatiwe imyaka mirongo itatu (30) y’igifungo kubera uruhare yagize mu kwica no gufata abagore n’abakobwa b’abatutsikazi ku ngufu mu gihe cya jenoside nyamara akaba akidegembya.

    Iyo baruwa  isaba itabwa muri yombi ry’uwitwa MULAMBA HAMISSI mwene MUSAFIRI MADJALIWA wo mu Biryogo mu karere ka Nyarugenge nawe wakatiwe adahari imyaka cumi nicyenda (19) n’urukiko  Gacaca rwa Biryogo bose bakaba bakomeje kwidegembya nyuma yo kwitabira inama y’igihugu y’umushyikirano.

    GAERG igaragaza ko abarokotse jenoside ivuganira batewe cyane impungenge no kuba abo bicanyi babahohoteye badafatwa ngo baryozwe ibyo bakoze. GAERG isanga   igihe icyo ari cyo cyose abo bajenosideri bashobora gutoroka bagasubira mu Bubiligi, igihugu kibacumbikiye imyaka irenga icumi (10).  Muri icyi gihe hamaze iminsi havugwa inkuru z’abarokotse jenoside bicwa Abarokotse jenoside baho icyaha cyabereye cyane cyane abatangabuhamya mu manza zabo ba ruharwa, ngo bahangayikishijwe n’umutekano wabo bityo bakaba bikanga guterwa ubwoba  cyangwa guhohoterwa mu rwego rwo gusibanganya ibimenyetso.

    Kuri ubu, biravugwa ko  nyuma y’inama y’igihugu y’umushyikirano ruharwa KIGURUBE  na mugenzi we MULAMBA  nka bamwe mu bagize itsinda rya diaspora baba bacumbikiwe muri imwe muri Hoteli nziza muri Kigali, kandi ikaba irinzwe cyane.  Abandi bakekwaho jenoside baje munama y’umushyikirano muri iryo tsinda rya Diaspora yo mu bubiligi bivugwa ko harimo uwitwa NTAKABURIMVANO Andre mwene Ntakaburimvano, uvuka Remera ya Kigali ahitwa mu Bibare.  Aba bajenosideri bose kimwe n’abandi bagize itsinda rya Diaspora bari gutemberezwa mu bice bitandukanye by’igihugu.

    Ku wa kabiri w’icyumweru gishize bamwe mu bagize iryo tsinda basuye u rwibutso  rwa Jenoside rwa Nyamata baherekejwe na Perezida wa Sena. Icyokora abakozi ba commission y’igihugu yo kurwanya jenoside( CNLG) bashinzwe inzibutso twavuganye badutangarije ko abagize itsinda rya Diaspora bitabiriye icyo gikorwa cyo gusura urwibutso rwa Nyamata atari benshi nkuko byari biteganyijwe.

    Nubwo itegeko ngenga rikuraho inkiko Gacaca riha amahirwe yo gusubirishamo urubanza abakatiwe nizo nkiko badahari igihe bagaragaje ko batari baratorotse ubutabera, GAERG ivuga ko hari impamvu nyinshi zigaragaza ko abo bakatiwe badahari baba bari baratorotse babigambiriye.

    Ubutabera bw’u Rwanda buramutse butaye muri yombi aba bajenosideri bari bitabiriye inama y’igihugu y’umushyikirano ntibyaba ari ubwambere.  Ku itariki 25/10/2002 uwitwa NYAGASAZA Mathias wari ku rutonde rwa ba ruharwa rwasohowe n’ubushinjacyaha mu igazeti ya Leta,  yatawe muri yombi nyuma yo kwitabira inama y’umushyikirano.  Ruharwa NYAGASAZA wamamaye mu iyicwa ry’Abagogwe yaje gukatirwa igihano cyo gufungwa burundu n’urukiko gacaca rwa Muhanda mu karere ka Ngororero aza no kugwa muri gereza ya Rubavu azize uburwayi mu mwaka wa 2011.

    GAERG ni umuryango washinzwe mu mwaka wa 2003 uhuje abarokotse jenoside  barenga igihumbi (1000) barangije za kaminuza. Kuri ubu, uwo muryango uharanira uburenganzira bw’abarokotse no guca umuco wo kudahana, ufite  imiryango iwushamikiyeho ku mugabane w’Uburayi na Leta zunze ubumwe za Amerika.

     End.

    Inkuru yanditswe na A .G

    lewis5 Lewis1     Lewis+6Lewis2

    PhotoI: Kigurube na Gen. Fred Ibingira / Photo 2, 3, 4 : Kigurube mu nama y’igihugu y’umushyikirano

  • Genocide widows concerned over post-gacaca compensation

    genocide-survivors

    After the gacaca courts were officially closed last year, Genocide widows have expressed concerns over the challenges they are facing in re­ceiving compensation form seized properties of convicts. This ruling was to be implemented after the official closing of the courts.

    Last week, voluntary parale­gals from the Association of Wid­ows of the Genocide against the Tutsis (AVEGA) held a meeting in which they discussed the chal­lenges that Genocide survivors encounter after the gacaca courts closed.

    Challenges in the gacaca rul­ings enforcement are diverse. In addition to many other chal­lenges, some local authorities in charge of enforcing gacaca rul­ings are allegedly bribed in order to avoid compensating victims.

    Jacqueline Bakamurera, the as­sistant attorney general in charge of Legal Aid and Human Rights, said that these local authorities have to be monitored, and that there has been another Maison de la Justice (MAJ) service set up to execute the gacaca rulings.

    Apart from local authorities, there are widows who have no gacaca court rulings documents, and others whose documents are not well done. According to AVEGA statistics, more than 8,000 cases are not enforced, more than 500 cases owners have no gacaca ruling documents, and more than 600 have ruling documents that are incomplete or not well done.

    As a result, Bakamurera says that the statistics from the court decisions do not match the reality at the ground.

    “We are doing our best to iden­tify the problems. If there are some officials who enforced the gacaca rulings and kept the mon­ey, the law is established to pun­ish them. It is a crime which is pe­nalized,” she said.

    The paralegals have shown that even when the court ruling is executed, the amount of mon­ey attainable from the sale of a convict’s property is reduced by taxes and other deductions, like remaining mortgage payments to banks. After all these deductions, there is little left to compensate the many survivors.

    Bakamurera explained that the law allows people to share the amount rewarded after bank and tax deductions.

    The problem with post-gacaca compensation has been an issue since just after the gacaca was of­ficially closed last year. In January, the Prime Minister’s special com­mittee was established to address all issues related to the property rights of survivors, including ga­caca compensation rulings that have not yet been enforced.

    AVEGA’s Paralegals are Geno­cide survivors who received trainings on law to help raise awareness on legal issues in the community. Odette Kayirere, the executive Secretary of the AVE­GA, said these voluntary para­legals play a big role in sensitiz­ing the community to understand their rights and to know which laws empower them.

    “There are some widows who are not aware of their rights, these paralegals help them so much,” she said.

    There are now about 1,000 voluntary paralegals across the country that help Genocide sur­vivors learn which process to fol­low for their cases executions and other legal rights

    First appeared in the Rwanda Focus

    Posted by Al.G